freaky leaks   Stay Out

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Salva

You may remember this movie Powder.

Victim, Nathan Forrest Winters, goes into some of the detail on how his predators “groomed” him and his family to molest him and film it.

So, Disney hired the director for a big movie 3 years after the conviction, for which he did 15 months, for Powder.

A Joe Rogan guest, and other abuse victim, talks about how Powder forwards the NAMBLA agenda.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/assange-considering-testifying-on-russian-role-in-trump-vote-20180809-p4zwcl.html

https://twitter.com/DRUDGE_REPORT/status/1027218912604082177

Julian Assange's attorney Jennifer Robinson tells @ABC News that Assange has said that the source of the leaked DNC emails "was not the Russian state and he has maintained that position throughout" https://t.co/KwcxBeonxX pic.twitter.com/Yt9T2QGV74

— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) August 7, 2018

Maybe the DNC finally got the tech good enough for an Assangebot to walk into a courtroom.

All kinds of open questions about what a testimony would look like, considering Assanges can be picked up by intelligence agencies as soon as he leaves the Ecuadorian embassy.

Is Assange changing his tune and starting to think he actually was manipulated by Russia.  Is he a Russian agent who will attempt to subvert the investigation.  Or will he simply stand up, and set the record straight to untangle some webs.  What’s he up to?  What’s the DNC up to?

It’s likely that Assange will maintain his stance that the information did not come from the Russian state, considering how adamant Wikileaks has been, and how consistent they’ve kept their story in the past.

It seems also likely that the Russian connection is over-represented as it has been used as a political talking point by the DNC since the campaign.  Even if some collusion did exist, it seems that this has been exaggerated, and not put in context of larger influences that sway elections.

Given the timing of Assanges leaks, it seems that the release was not just informative, but also very political.  And if they wanted Bernie Sanders to win, they could have released it before the primary.  Thus, perhas Assange’s agenda seems to be decidedly anti-Democrat.  Or perhaps not his agenda or the agenda of wikileaks, but the agenda of his source.

So who’s politics drove the leaks, if not Russia?  Who stands to benefit?  A narrative can be written for pretty much anyone.  Maybe even China.  But that doesn’t necessarily make whoever’s behind it the enemy of the people.

Or maybe it just came from someone within the DNC, or the Bernie Sanders campaign.  Some technical details of where the data comes from indicates it could of been Seth Rich, who was mysteriously murdered.  And Wikileaks offered a reward for solving the murder of Seth Rich…

http://www.riggedit.com/seth-rich/

With so much at stake, we’ll have to wait and see, or maybe will never know.  Don’t put it past the DNC to cover it up as Russian lead, but also don’t put it past Russia.

Hopefully the fidelity of whatever information comes next can guide us through any manipulation.

It’s very simple.  Those chambers on the inside are ramps.  No need for external ramps, they just left hollow spaces as they built up to bring the blocks up from the inside.  It seems so obvious now.

Props to Jean Pierre Houdin, an architect who just came up with this theory on the side and then followed through and has a team in line to investigate one of the chamber openings.  And shame on the rest of us for not thinking of this ourselves.

https://interestingengineering.com/copy-great-pyramid-planned-built-2025

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Pierre_Houdin

Blue pillin.  Uh oh.  Welcome back home?